It seems like most men are secretly attracted to preteen girls, but they go around telling people they're not so they can meet some false idea of what a few have deemed as “normal”. I don’t understand why most people think prison studies (a small segment of the population) are more important than general population studies (like the Kent State one) when studying preteen-attraction.
#TROPICAL CUTIES NUDE TEEN GIRLS PICTURES FREE#
Like saying, ALL free same-age attracted adults with no criminal records will rape because all convicted rapists rape. That would be like making generalizations about the prevalence and manner of same-age (normal) attraction based off ONLY interviewing convicted rapists. It seems as though all the media’s stereotypes are based off prisoner studies. I haven’t found ANY objective, fair studies that support the idea that preteen-attraction is rare or that all preteen-attracted adults are crazy monster (like the media says). This is why objective studies are much more meaningful than adamant, violent denial rants. That would be like asking a thief if he steals, of course he’s going to say no. I know that many people are going to post and say, “you have nothing to worry about, those studies are wrong, it’s rare, I don’t know anyone attracted to preteens”… but denying something that’s controversial to not deny means nothing. No similar studies have been conducted since this one because people know the results will be the same and they don't want further proof about how common attraction to preteens is.
#TROPICAL CUTIES NUDE TEEN GIRLS PICTURES FULL#
The full report is quite detailed and it explains the many controls that were in place to ensure the result were accurate. Prior to the study, 80% of the participants claimed to have no attraction to children and all of them had no history of illegal or legal youth attracted behavior.įor credibility information about this study, simply type in the citation info from the beginning of this post. 95% exhibited arousal to the female adult images.Ī staggering 88.7% exhibited arousal to the female child (less than 12 years old) images. The team carried out hundreds of tests exposing men to female adult and child images.
Nagayama, Richard Hirschman) was conducted on a sample of normal (adult attracted) male volunteers using the "penile plethysmograph". I was doing a school project for psychology class and came across this study.īased on objective studies, rather than anecdotal evidence and adamant denial rants (which mean nothing), about 90% of men are attracted to preteen girls.Ī peer-reviewed scientific journal study (Behavior Therapy 26, 681-694, 1995), conducted by Kent State University, 1995 (Lori L. While she's only on screen maybe 20 minutes, and the film is bursting with all manner of lavish special effects and histrionic performances, Mathilda May's scenes are the principle thing that keep Lifeforce memorable more than 30 years on.Why are so many men attracted to preteens? But for all the things it gets wrong, Lifeforce got one thing very right indeed, and that's the casting of its central interstellar seductress.Īs might be ascertained from the title of the Colin Wilson novel on which it's based (The Space Vampires), the film casts May as an undead alien who comes to Earth to feed on the life energy of human beings, and makes her job that bit easier by taking the form of a beautiful young woman with a severe aversion to clothing. The infamously ludicrous Cannon Films sci-fi horror epic pretty much put the last nail in the coffin of the once-esteemed director Tobe Hooper's mainstream career. When the guard in the military hospital gasps into his radio, "you'll never believe what I'm looking at!", it's a pretty good approximation of how most of us, male and female alike, will react to the sight of Mathilda May in Lifeforce. Mathilda May - Lifeforce (1985) wikipedia